Before Thor hit theaters in 2011, I really wasn't familiar with that
particular line of Marvel Comics. But after seeing the hero in action in Thor and The
Avengers I've really come to like the
titular character and his adoptive brother. When Thor: The Dark World (2013) was announced I was chomping at the bit
to see these characters in action again.
Eons ago a race of beings known as
Dark Elves tried to send the universe into darkness by useing a weapon known as
the Aether. Warriors from Asgard stopped them but their leader Malekith (The
Doctor Christopher Eccleston) escapes to wait for another opportunity. The
Asgard Warriors find the Aether and since it cannot be destroyed, they hide it.
In present day, Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) awaits the return of Thor
although it has been two years since they last saw one another. In the meantime,
Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stands imprisoned for his war crimes on Earth while Thor
(Chris Hemsworth) has been trying to bring peace to the nine realms following
the reconstruction of the Bifröst, the "Rainbow Bridge" between
realms, which was destroyed two years earlier. Jane discovers an anomaly
similar to the one that brought Thor to Earth. She goes to investigate, and
becomes infected by the lost Aether. Learning of Jane's sudden disappearance,
Thor goes to Earth to retrieve her and takes her to Asgard to try and remove
the Aether. Malekith, upon sensing the Aether's location attacks Asgard. In a
desperate attempt to stop Malekith, Thor is forced to seek help from the
treacherous Loki.
While I did enjoy the first Thor movie, I think this is more of what
fans were originally hoping for. Thor travels to more of the Nine Realms, we
get to see more of Asgard, the characters are a bit more developed, there's
bigger action. I really appreciate how events from Thor and The Avengers are
acknowledged and were used as plot devices. The Bifröst is kind of a
teleportation device that was destroyed at the end of Thor and without it, the Asgardians couldn't travel the Nine Realms
to keep the peace. Also Loki tried to take over the Earth in The Avengers and is being imprisoned for
it. Because details like these were included, it makes the world setting a bit
more believable.
Most everyone reprises their
previous role, including Idris Elba as Heimdall, Kat Dennings as Darcy, Stellan
Skarsgård as Dr. Erik Selvig, Rene Russo as Frigga Thor's mother, and the
legendary Anthony Hopkins as Odin. All do a great job, and their characters are
more fleshed out. For example, Dr. Selvig had his brain taken over by Loki in The Avengers which has caused some
psychological problems that are both useful and a hinderance. Darcy is now more
than comic relief, and plays a more active part in helping saving the world.
Tom Hiddleston is simply amazing. His role as Loki did for the Marvel Comics
movies what Heath Ledger did for the The
Dark Knight as The Joker; they added a hugely
successful character that everyone both loves and hates and made the movies all
the better for it. What was really interesting is Loki's relationship with his
adoptive mother Frigga. Loki is at a very low point and his mother is the only
one to offer him compassion; while he tries to act strong and tough, Loki needs
his mom. I love Christopher Eccleston; he was a great bad guy in 28
Days Later, and he makes a great, if shallow,
megalomaniacal villain out for revenge here.
I was a bit disappointed in Natalie
Portman's role. While Jane is certainly longing for Thor, they don't really do
a whole lot together; even in scenes where both characters are present. It's a
bit sad that the love/hate sibling relationship between Thor and Loki outshines
the romantic love interest between the hero and the damsel in distress.
I love this mash up of sci-fi and
fantasy. There are holes in space, spaceships, and other sci-fi gadgetry
alongside swords, magical items, and spell casting. It's high end
sci-fi/fantasy stuff that is pretty fun
to watch. Parts of it feels a bit rushed and undeveloped. I didn't understand
why physics didn't apply on part of earth when the worlds were aligning, and
why Earth machinery used to detect spatial anomalies was suddenly able to
create them. But who cares? It's a sci-fi/fantasy/superhero movie! While the
"what" of the story should make some sense in the big picture, some
"why" questions don't require detailed answers to still make a fun
movie. That results in a story that is mostly just fun to watch and doesn't
require a great deal of mental energy to enjoy.
The fight scene at the end was
really exciting, but what was also neat was that while these god-like beings
fought one another, the humans helped the hero save the day and keep other
people safe. They did this in Man
of Steel, too. The humans are being heroes
every bit as much as the super-powered being from another planet; not just
standing idly by and hoping everything turns out okay. They even help Thor get
an edge in the fight. I love how everyone gets to help save the day.
Thor: The Dark World
was fun, but wasn't a great movie. The action is good, the acting is mostly
good, the special effects are great, the story isn't all that original, but the
characters are really good; Thor and Loki in particular are interesting with
the trust issues and sibling rivalry dynamic. It's better than the first Thor movie and it embraces it's fantasy
roots with some exciting and entertaining results. Thor: The Dark World is worth seeing, but probably after it hits
home video. Of course if you are collecting the whole Marvel Cinematic
Universe movies, you'll want to buy this on
Blu-Ray. And of course, stick around for the post-credits scene.
Which of the villains in these Marvel/Avengers movies have you liked the best? I think I have to go with Loki. Comment below and tell me your favorite!
Which of the villains in these Marvel/Avengers movies have you liked the best? I think I have to go with Loki. Comment below and tell me your favorite!
No comments:
Post a Comment