From
the moment I heard about a World War Z
movie I was beside myself with enthusiasm and anticipation. That was all
destroyed when I saw the first trailer for the 2013 movie. I'm a fan of Max
Brooks World War Z novel, and I had
high hopes for a good movie but it was blatantly evident just from the teaser
trailer that the movie would have little, if anything, to do with the book. I
became dead set on boycotting the movie based on the trailer. Curiosity got the
best of me and I went to see World War Z
in theaters and I have to admit, I'm glad I swallowed my pride.
Life
for former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) and his family
seem content. News of a mysterious infection that is rapidly becoming a
worldwide pandemic is everywhere, and it's not long before the Lane family sees
the plague hit their Newark, New Jersey home. Infected people quickly become
rampaging mindless zombies. After barely escaping the chaos, Gerry is persuaded
by the UN Deputy Secretary-General to go on a mission to investigate the
disease in exchange for keeping Gerry's family safe. What follows is a perilous
trek around the world where Gerry must brave horrific dangers and long odds to
find answers before the entire world's human civilization falls.
Max
Brooks' novel reads like a non-fiction book. It's a series of oral interviews
conducted by an agent of the UN Postwar Commission with people who have
interesting personal stories about the global zombie war (World War Z) and
gives a broad overview of the fictional event that nearly wiped out humanity.
If I were in charge of the world, World
War Z would be a sort of mockumentary with interviews and footage from the
zombie war. District 9 did something
like this and it was fantastic! Had World
War Z been structured similarly, the movie would probably have appeased a
lot more fans.
While
World War Z is absolutely a zombie
movie, it doesn't revolve specifically around the zombies being gross and
killing people. That is present and there is plenty of it, but the movie
focuses primarily on the outbreak and public panic. There's a crisis and people
panic and there are innumerable complications that arise from it; stampeding
panicked mobs, traffic jams, looting stores for medicines and emergency
supplies, people so on edge that they accidentally kill each other for fear
that someone might be a zombie, etc. This is played out really well; it's
actually more unsettling to watch society collapse under insane panic than it
is to see a twitchy, screeching zombie tackle someone to the ground and bite
into them.
Fans
of blood and gore horror movies will probably be a bit disappointed with World War Z; there is hardly any blood
and gore in the movie. Generally zombie movies will focus a lot on the violence
and try to generate some kind of shock value from seeing limbs torn off or blood gush and
splatter from wounds. Yes, I suppose that can be fun for some viewers, but
again the zombie mayhem wasn't the primary focus in the movie. This easily
could have achieved an R rating by focusing more on individuals resisting
zombie attacks and the bloody conflict that would ensue, but the movie has a
broader scope. Taking the time to focus on the open wounds of a few individuals
would have detracted from the macro-level scale of the film. It also kept the
film in the much more marketable rating of PG-13. Besides, zombie blood and
gore effects are so simple to make that even low-budget independent films can
pull it off easily. Having a zombie film without those sorts of effects and
still manage to put audiences on edge suggests that the director, Marc Forster,
did an excellent job.
I
loved the mood of World War Z. It was
remarkably tense. I've had several people say they haven't been so on edge
during a film since they saw Ridley Scott's Alien
movie. I have to agree! The movie focuses a lot on mood and atmosphere and amps
up the tension substantially. Many contemporary horror movies don't focus
enough on creating that sense of dread and palpable foreboding. Not only did World War Z do this, it did it very
well! There's a scene where Gerry has to navigate through a building full of
dormant zombies and the slightest stimulus will wake them. Every little sound
is like a death sentence. That is what horror movies are supposed to be like
and this movie achieves that sense of tension exquisitely.
The
mood, setting, and tension are beautifully done, but the script and characters
are kind of flimsy. The script does an excellent job of establishing the world
setting and the "rules" for its particular brand of zombies. The
story itself is pretty repetitive. Gerry arrives at a place that has the
situation mostly under control, and then all hell breaks loose. He arrives
somewhere else that is reasonably calm and contained, then things fall apart.
It sticks to a fairly predictable pattern throughout the movie. The characters
weren't developed in much detail. Sure, Brad Pitt plays his role well, but the
character isn't very deep. His family members even less so. I wouldn't really
have cared had his family died at the beginning of the movie. Gerry's wife
seems to be present exclusively for the purpose of having Gerry call her
between scenes to let her know he's still alive. Again, the movie is focusing
primarily on the setting and atmosphere, but I think the overall quality of the
film would have been improved if Gerry at least had been fleshed out more as a
character.
The
special effects were pretty impressive for the most part. Yes, there are scenes
that are obviously achieved by CGI, but for the most part, it all looks pretty
convincing. My favorite scene is in Jerusalem where countless hoards of zombies
are trying to get over the large wall built around the city and they mindlessly
pile on top of each other trying to chase a single target. The zombies actually
pour into the city looking for all the world like a cascading river of bodies
flooding the streets. What's more, the scene takes place during the day where
nothing is left to the obscurity of darkness. It's incredible to watch and made
me wish each shot would last a little longer so I could just watch and
appreciate how amazing the movement and detail is.
If
you are a fan of the World War Z
book, you really should try to distance yourself from the book and just go
watch the movie. It's pretty good on its own even if it has little to do with
the book. The setting is remarkable, the tension is palpable, the visual
effects are excellent and have made World
War Z one of the most expensive zombie films to date. The story and
characters are a bit weak, but most everything else in the movie is pretty
solid. If you've read the book or even Brooks' The Zombie Survival Guide (both
of which I recommend), you may notice some subtle references in the movie here
and there. I think the World War Z
movie will ultimately be accepted into the zombie movie cannon. I recommend
seeing World War Z, but it can
probably wait for a home video release; the cinematography is good, but I don't
think it gains anything significant by being on a big screen.
Here's the trailer for World War Z so you can catch a brief shot of that cascading river of bodies scene:
What is your favorite zombie movie? Comment below and tell me why!
No comments:
Post a Comment