Hollywood
is notorious for making movies based on classic and bestselling novels and
jazzing them up and twisting them around to appeal to audiences. The Great Gatsby (2013) looks pretty
flashy for a movie based on a character driven story which a lot of people
dreaded reading in high school. That aspect alone made me leery, but I was
enticed by the visuals in the trailer so I saw it anyway.
In
the spring of 1922, an era of loosening morals, glittering jazz, bootleg kings,
and sky-rocketing stocks, would-be writer Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) leaves
his Midwest town and moves to New York City. Chasing his own American Dream,
Nick lands next door to a mysterious, party-giving millionaire, Jay Gatsby
(Leonardo DiCaprio). Within eyesight across the bay lives Nick's cousin, Daisy
(Carey Mulligan), and her unfaithful, blue-blooded husband, Tom Buchanan (Joel
Edgerton). It is thus that Nick is drawn into the captivating world of the
super rich, their illusions, loves, and deceits. As Nick bears witness, within
and without the world he inhabits, he pens a tale of impossible love,
incorruptible dreams, and high-octane tragedy.
The Great Gatsby is a character
driven story. There's a lot of scenes that are dialogue driven, and they are
well written. The script really is great and the dialogue for each character
seems believable, sounds contemporary to the time period, and moves the story
forward. These dialogue driven scenes are set against some phenomenal sets and
costumes. It's not necessarily distracting, but it seems odd to have such rich
visual detail in scenes that do little more than have characters talk with one
another. Similar to my odd complaint about Funny
Girl, the sets were huge, elaborate, and detailed, even if they were
mostly digital. There are tons of sweeping camera shots and wide angles that
capture a lot of background motion and detail. It seems gratuitous and
"visually loud." I'm not sure how else to describe it. It looks
amazing, no doubt about it, yet superfluous.
Look at this guy! How can you not love this guy? |
Leonardo
DiCaprio was an excellent choice for Jay Gatsby. Gatsby is supposed to be a
likable character and I can't think of a role I've seen DiCaprio in where you
didn't want to root for him. Nick describes Gatsby this way: "He had one
of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it, that you may
come across four or five times in life. It faced, or seemed to face, the whole
external world for an instant and then concentrated on you with an irresistible
prejudice in your favor. It understood you just as far as you wanted to be
understood, believed in you as you would like to believe in yourself."
When we see Gatsby for the first time he gushes with charm and likeableness.
DiCaprio plays to that character description astoundingly well. Also, he say
"old sport" perfectly. Most everyone else's acting seemed overly
dramatic and even silly at times. These are good actors, so I blame the
director, Baz Luhrmann, for making them act that way.
I
would have liked to hear music that was more in times with the 1920's. 20's
swing and jazz music captivated the feel of the era. Instead, the music that
was used was something called "Electro Swing." It combines old big
band swing style music with some techno sounds and beats using synthesizers and
electronic drum machines. I've only recently started hearing this niche music
genre, and some of it isn't half bad. Unfortunately several of the specific
songs used in Gatsby are half bad. I understand wanting to use a sound track
that is both marketable to teenage movie goers and wanting to use music from
the time period. Electro Swing is a logical choice. But the modern rap vocals
used in several songs seem so painfully out of place for a movie set in the
20's that it made me wish they had simply stuck with actual 1920's music.
It's
no secret that Hollywood butchers literature in the interest of ticket sales.
The end result is a movie with the title of a good piece of literature which, more
often than not, has little to do with said good literature. Once in a while
we're thrown a curveball and we get a movie that actually holds true to the
book it's based on. I have not read The
Great Gatsby, but from what I understand, the movie manages to get the
books' symbolism and themes across very well. It acts as a cautionary tale
about the decadent downside of the American dream. There are themes of aspiring
to start over again, social politics and the brutality and betrayal that comes
with it, the perception of our own ideals and of those of other people. It
comments on the excess of the rich, the recklessness of youth, and materialism
and worldliness. With these themes well incorporated, The Great Gatsby does a splendid job of causing us to reflect on
our own modern times and struggles.
The Great Gatsby was a good
movie. The visuals were incredible, even if they were excessive. DiCaprio was
excellent, as usual, and outshines the rest of the cast. The music could have
been better if other songs within the same sub-genre had been used. The themes
were beautifully incorporated, and should cause us to reflect upon our modern
society. I saw The Great Gatsby in
2D, but there were several scenes that made me stop and think, "You know,
that would probably look really cool in 3D." I'm glad I saw The Great Gatsby, but I didn't really
enjoy it enough to want to own a copy. It's worth catching in theaters,
possibly in 3D. Even if you don't catch it in theaters, it's worth the price to
rent.
What's
a classic piece of literature you would love to see made into a good quality
movie? Comment below and tell me all about it!
No comments:
Post a Comment