Showing posts with label Ken Watanabe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ken Watanabe. Show all posts

Friday, May 23, 2014

Godzilla Review


Godzilla is one of the most recognizable symbols of Japanese pop culture worldwide and is a major icon in cinema history. America tried to make their own movie featuring the giant lizard back in 1998 which, frankly, wasn't very good. Hollywood decided to take another crack at it and we have Godzilla (2014).
When a Japanese nuclear plant goes into meltdown mode and the wife of Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston) gets caught on the wrong side of the containment door, a massive cover-up ensues. Fifteen years later, Joe's son Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) has become a bomb-disposal expert in the U.S. military. After returning home to his wife Elle (Elizabeth Olsen) and their son Sam (Carson Bolde) he gets word that Joe has been arrested in Japan. Ford ventures to Japan and reluctantly agrees to join Joe in traveling to their old home in the quarantine zone. The pair are taken into custody end up in the plant where Joe used to work, and where Dr. Ichiro Serizawa (Ken Watanabe) is studying a massive cocoon-like structure that appears to feed on radiation. The situation turns critical when the events of the present mirror those of the past and a terrifying winged-creature dubbed "MUTO" is unleashed. Meanwhile, as the military attempts to devise a plan to destroy the beast, signals indicate that is has been calling out to something before it broke free, and the scientists learn that is has awoken a towering godlike leviathan that has lain dormant for centuries.
In the original 1954 Godzilla movie, Godzilla represented the fears that many Japanese held about the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the possibility of recurrence. While the movie featured a rubber suit monster stomping on cardboard buildings, it primarily focused on the humans being affected by the trauma and disaster, and it was poignant. I think that's what the goal was in this 2014 movie, but the story arches for all but Joe's character were flat and uninteresting. Joe was fanatical about uncovering what he believed to be a massive cover-up that caused the death of his wife for whom he still grieves. Ford was conveniently a military character so we see what the military was doing. His wife's character was conveniently a medical civilian in San Francisco so we could see the people affected by the monster fights. Everything that makes up Ford and Elle is the fact that they want to see each other again. Joe really is the only character that's even remotely interesting. Stronger and more interesting human characters would have made the whole movie much better.
But who goes to see a Godzilla movie to watch the human characters? The monsters were amazing in this movie! The MUTO (Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organism) was huge and scary looking, and seemingly unstoppable as it travels across continents seeking out radiation to consume. Godzilla himself was incredible! We don't get a real good shot of him until about halfway through the movie, but it's worth the wait. All of Godzilla's previous incarnations were used for inspiration during design, making this Godzilla resemble the classic sci-fi monster we all love rather than that goofy, long-legged iguana in the 1998 film. They even revamped the original Godzilla "roar" for this movie. Since the terrible human storylines take up a lot of movie time, we don't see a whole lot of monster fights. They take place in the background while the human drama takes center stage. I really think this movie would have been better with more monster action, but what we do get to see is nothing short of jaw-dropping.
In the storyline, Godzilla is an apex predator and arrives to protect his territory from rival predators. He doesn't want them encroaching on his food source (radiation). He's not there just to stomp on major cities and cause trouble. Thematically, Godzilla is nature's force for balance. The military is conflicted about the wisdom of allowing Godzilla to attack the MUTO, but Dr. Serizawa states, " The arrogance of men is thinking nature is in their control and not the other way around. Let them fight." The colossal beasts fight, and Godzilla ends up looking like the best chance for survival since the military weapons seem to have no affect on the monsters at all. The monsters aren't out to specifically destroy things, it's just cities happen to get in the way of their animal behavior.
There is a lot about this new Godzilla movie to praise. This is only Gareth Edwards' second feature film to direct, but he has a masterful grasp of camera work and cinematography. The visuals are stunning to say the least, even when there aren't colossal monsters stomping around. The score is as epic as a movie featuring a legendary one hundred meter-tall behemoth. The CGI rendered monsters are incredible and are animated to illustrate the sheer magnitude and weight these giants have, comparable to that of Pacific Rim. It is an absolute delight to watch.
Godzilla was pretty darn good despite some writing flaws. The monotonous, non-developing human characters were tedious to endure and took center stage a bit too often. Even when they were moving along their weak story arches, it remains a visually striking and gorgeous movie to watch. It borrows from the "Spielbergian" style from the way the camera moves, to the use of music, to the gradual rolling out of the big effects. The action is tense, the monsters are larger-than-life, and the music is outstanding! Props to Gareth Edwards for taking what has for decades been a loved but albeit laughable franchise and made it into something audiences will flock to see. This is worth catching in theaters; Godzilla just won't look as amazing on a small TV screen. I might consider getting this on Blu-Ray eventually, but it's certainly worth watching at least once.

Which classic Godzilla monster is your favorite? Apart from the King of Monsters himself, I like Mothra a lot. Comment below and tell me yours!

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Batman Begins Movie Review

Batman movies have had a longstanding tradition of being totally silly. From the 1966 Batman movie with its “Shark Repellant” to Batman and Robin that attempts to be family friendly and silly. While making a family friendly movie isn’t bad, making a family friendly Batman movie is something like trying to make a family friendly version of The Godfather. You’re just going to besmirch the pervasive dark themes and complex characters. Fortunately, Christopher Nolan finally brought us the type of Batman story we’ve been expecting for decades with Batman Begins (2005).
Millionaire playboy Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) still grieves the loss of his philanthropic parents to a senseless crime. While traveling the world to research the nature of evil, he is discovered by Henri Ducard (Liam Neeson) and Ra’s Al Ghul (Ken Watanabe) in China taking on petty thieves in a prison. They train Bruce how to fight evil and strike fear into the hearts of his enemies as a symbol rather than as a man. After Bruce learns of their plot to wipe out evil in his home city of Gotham, Bruce attempts to stop them and returns home. Back in his original surroundings, Bruce adopts the image of a bat to strike fear into criminals as the icon known as “Batman.” Things don’t stay quiet for long as the corrupt psychologist Dr. Jonathan Crane (Cillian Murphy) works to pollute the water supply with a panic-inducing psychoactive drug that will cause the citizens of Gotham to tear themselves apart out of fear.
I admit to being a much bigger fan of the Marvel superheroes. Batman is probably the only DC hero I really like. Batman is one of DC Comic’s most legendary superheroes, second only to Superman. Tim Burton’s two Batman movies were good, but Batman Begins shows us Batman finally getting the treatment and respect he deserves. This is one of the greatest revamps given to a cultural icon.
Comic books that made it to the big screen have for a long while been rather silly romps of action and gratuitous special effects. Some of these movies are fun, but a bit hard to take very seriously. Batman Begins goes in a drastically different direction than its forbears. Everything is significantly more grounded; there are no crazy, over the top super powers or sci-fi gadgetry in this movie. There are fictional, but believable, hallucinogenic drugs. There is also an almost forgotten scientific genius at Wayne Corp. named Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman) in research and development. He supplies Bruce with high-end military grade prototype gadgets that never went into production because they were not cost efficient. Coupled with Bruce’s ninja-like training, he is able to do some incredible stunts without pushing credibility over the edge.
All the other Batman movies have addressed why Bruce Wayne identifies with bats (childhood trauma) and hates evildoers (he witnessed his parents being killed by a mugger). We are so familiar with that aspect of Batman it almost seems cliché and redundant to reiterate it in another movie. Yet in Batman Begins these are major plot devices and are given significant weight and depth. It’s also fascinating to see how Bruce develops as a character and invents Batman as he goes along. He’s a bit of a slow learner, making clumsy mistakes and taking foolish risks as he starts out. Even after he has an established the “Batman” persona and disguise he still needs to call upon the aid of his family butler, Alfred (Michael Caine), to get him out of a bind.
Batman Begins is an amazingly good superhero movie. It doesn’t have the silly, flashy gloss of earlier films. Everything feels more grounded and believable than the average superhero movie. The characters are complex and interesting. The story is deep and meaningful. The imagery gets pretty intense, so I wouldn’t recommend showing it to younger viewers. There really isn’t anything negative I can say about this. It has become an instant classic, and it will be a long time before we accept a non-Christopher Nolan Batman. This one is definitely worth owning on Blu-Ray. I highly recommend seeing this if you haven’t already, and if you have, I would highly recommend seeing it again.

What’s your favorite non-Christopher Nolan Batman movie to date? Comment below and tell me why!