As I understand it,
Marvel/Disney was originally considering doing only one superhero team up movie,
but after The
Avengers broke box office records and became the third highest grossing
film, they changed their minds. Following The
Avengers we got to keep up with some of our heroes in Iron
Man 3, Thor:
The Dark World, and Captain
America: The Winter Soldier. Finally, with much anticipation, The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) was
released. While it's an exciting and fun ride, it's not nearly as satisfying as
the first Avengers movie.
Now officially fighting
as allies, The Avengers - Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr), Steve Rogers (Chris
Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), Natasha Romanoff
(Scarlett Johansson), and Clint Barton (Jeremy Renner) - raid a Hydra outpost
where Hydra has been experimenting on humans using the scepter previously
wielded by Loki. The Avengers encounter two of the experiments; twins Pietro
(Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) who possess powers
of superhuman speed and psychic powers respectively. Once the scepter is
retrieved, Stark and Banner discover an artificial intelligence within the
scepter's gem and secretly use it to complete Stark's Ultron global defense
program. Unexpectedly, Ultron (James Spader) believes he must eradicate
humanity to save Earth. The Ultron A.I. eliminates Stark's A.I, J.A.R.V.I.S.
(Paul Bettany), takes control of Starks global defense program, and attacks The
Avengers in their headquarters. Building newer mechanical bodies to house
himself in, Ultron soon has an army of robots under his control as well as the
Maximoff twins. Ultron puts his complex plan into action, but as he
systematically exploits the weaknesses of each of The Avengers, the six of them
may not be enough to save the world again.
Joss Whedon returns to
direct Age of Ultron. He's proved his
writing and directing skills many times over. He is particularly proficient in
telling stories with multiple characters; it's tricky to tell a good story
about more than one or two characters and still give them their own compelling
story arch. That was expertly done in the previous Avengers movie. Here, Whedon again allows the very distinct
characters their own screen time, lets them have their moment to shine, and
lets them bounce off of each other wonderfully.
There are problems with
the movie, though, and I'm not confident that it is Whedon's fault. I can tell
studio executives got their hands on things a lot, effectively limiting and
constraining Whedon's creative liberties. It's as if they tinkered with what
was probably a much better script to maximize what they thought would make
money and draw in audiences, at the expense of what would be a solid,
satisfying movie. Iron Man, The Avengers, Guardians
of the Galaxy, and Captain America:
The Winter Soldier were phenomenal successes because they were left in the
hands of competent directors and writers. If future Marvel movies are
manipulated by the studio and executives as much as this one is, I can't see
the franchise doing as well further down the road.
The movie becomes
practically bloated with his huge cast of characters with new allies, enemies,
and cameos making appearances. Maria Hill, Nick Fury, War Machine, Peggy
Carter, Prof. Selvig, Heimdall, and Falcon all return from previous movies to
make appearances to varying degrees. There are even some overt hints at future
characters whom we know will be getting their own movies if you know what to
look for. Don't get me wrong, it's incredibly exciting to see more Marvel
characters make it to the big screen, but it effectively gets to the point that
there are too many characters to keep track of. Age of Ultron doesn't rely on previous films to develop the
returning characters; they still develop and have their own story arches, but
there are so many story arches to keep track of.
Age
of Ultron is a long movie with a run time just shy of
two and a half hours. As I understand it, it was originally closer to three
hours long. You can tell that there were chunks of the movie omitted. After
having his mind toyed with by Wanda, Thor decides that he must leave briefly go
on a vision quest. We see very little of this quest, none of the actual vision,
and are left confused by Thor's sudden change in perspective. This was not a
small change as Thor suddenly takes actions against his fellow Avengers,
insisting that they trust him. We don't understand Thor's motives here, and it
is caused by important scenes being cut from the movie. There are a couple of
other times where scenes left on the cutting room floor make the story hard to
follow. It's no less exciting and fun to watch, but certainly gets harder to
follow and a bit confusing.
One of my favorite
scenes was the party following the retrieval of Loki's scepter. Our heroes are
socializing, relaxing, and sharing their victory. Thor and Stark quibble about
who has the better girlfriend, Romanoff and Banner flirt with one another in a
charmingly awkward way, Rhodes/War Machine tries to find an audience to tell
his victory stories to, Steve gives relationship advice about waiting too long,
and it culminates with various characters trying to lift Thor's hammer. This
developed the characters various histories, interests, and personalities
wonderfully. But the tone changes drastically when Ultron interrupts, appearing
for the first time in a battered mechanical body. He's weak and just learning
how to make a body for himself; he resembles a broken, creepy marionette and
delivers a disturbing and beautifully written dialogue about how The Avengers
are all killers, and he has a mission to bring peace to the world. In spite of
its flaws, what the movie does well, it does very well. It may be
bloated with many characters, but they are, for the most part, good characters.
Even Ultron is an intimidating and menacing villain.
The previous Avengers movie was incredible, and was
greater than the sum of its parts. The
Avengers: Age of Ultron, frankly, is not. But it still boasts some pretty
incredible parts and is one heck of a fun superhero party. There's more
superhero action, the story is influenced by the various storylines from all
the previous Marvel
Cinematic Universe movies all the way back to Iron Man, and boasts some amazing visual effects. It is abundantly clear
that the movie suffers from creative constraints imposed by the studio and
scenes that were left on the cutting room floor. But there is going to be a
three-hour extended cut with an alternate ending available once it hits
blue-ray, so maybe that will improve the overall quality by having few scenes
left out. This is absolutely worth seeing in the theaters; it may not be as
satisfying as the previous film, but it's not one to miss. I also advise watching the phase two Marvel movies I mentioned at the top of this review
again to remember where our heroes were before this movie started.
Joss Whedon won't be returning for the third Avengers movie. Do you think another director will do as good a job? Comment below and tell me what you think!
Joss Whedon won't be returning for the third Avengers movie. Do you think another director will do as good a job? Comment below and tell me what you think!
I think Jon Favreau could handle it, if he ever decided to come back. He can navigate quick, clever dialogue, and big action sequences. I wish Whedon would write the script, still. His writing is marvelous.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more! Though I think after the treatment Favreau got previously, especially after getting the whole Marvel Cinematic Universe rolling, I doubt he'd come back to work on another Marvel film.
Delete