Even
though I don’t think it was too soon to make a movie about the bin Laden
manhunt, I’m still surprised someone had the guts to do it. Zero Dark Thirty (2012) had a great
opportunity to be politically skewed, so I wasn’t sure it would be worth the
effort. However it is well done, and is up for several Oscar nominations
including Best Picture and Best Actress.
Maya
(Jessica Chastain) is a CIA operative whose first experience is in the
interrogation of prisoners following the Al Qaeda attacks against the U.S. on
September 11th, 2001. She is a reluctant participant in extreme
duress applied to the detainees, but believes that the truth may only be
obtained though such tactics. For several years, she is single-minded in her
pursuit of leads to uncover the whereabouts of Al Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin
Laden. Finally in 2011, it appears that her work will pay off, and a U.S. Navy
SEAL team is sent in to capture bin Laden. But only Maya is confident bin Laden
is where she says he is. If she’s wrong, it will bring worldwide shame to the
United States for breaking into a compound on the land of a nation that is
tentatively an ally.
The
9/11 attacks are still an emotionally and politically charged subject and I
feel as though there was no way to make this movie without offending someone to
at least some degree. Yes, we see some CIA officers using torture and
humiliation tactics to get information from prisoners at a black site. That is
going to cause some people to cringe; they don’t want to see that and they
won’t want to acknowledge that Americans were torturing prisoners for
information. If that had been left out, other viewers would be offended and
accuse the film of being biased, that Hollywood is trying to hide the truth, or
that Zero Dark Thirty used
rose-tinted camera lenses or something.
My
biggest concern was that the movie would be politically skewed and would
glorify President Obama and demonizing President Bush, or vice versa. This
didn’t happen. In fact, mention of either President was minimal at most. It didn’t
suggest that 9/11 was an inside job or anything. I was so relieved that Zero Dark Thirty was not so politically
skewed and simply focused on objective facts.
I’m
glad that this movie didn’t use big name actors. With two exceptions, I didn’t
know a single actor. I recognized Joel Edgerton as the Red Squadron Team Leader
from The Odd Life of Timothy Green
and from Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith as young Uncle Lars. I also recognized John Barrowman from the Doctor Who and Torchwood TV shows. Because I didn’t recognize any of the actors,
it made the movie seem more realistic; that is to say that it wasn’t made
glamorous by adding big name actors or actors who look good and have no talent.
Okay,
Jessica Chastain was in The Help, but
I didn’t make that connection until looking up her filmography a couple of days
afterwards. She was outstanding in Zero
Dark Thirty. Early on she’s an uncertain and reserved individual, but she
grows into this confident, powerful woman whom even upper level CIA personnel are
hesitant to disagree with. Chastain carries the movie; it wouldn’t have been
nearly as good without her. Her delivery is intense and powerful and simply
blows you away. She’s got my vote for Best Actress.
Zero Dark Thirty has an episodic
structure; it’s a string of short stories that usually center on Maya.
Typically this sort of movie focuses on the marines, and not the government
intelligence that leads the hunt for someone like bin Laden. This is largely
about the people doing research, typing on their computers, making logical
connections, and chasing paper trails. It’s almost like a whodunit sort of
mystery, except that we know whodunit and we just need to find where he is. The
story spans several years, other characters weave in and out of the story, and
we see several Al Qaeda attacks that you’ll recognize if you watch the news at
all. It’s very episodic, and at times focuses on the dull paperwork and other
times on very tense action. We know how the
movie ends, but there is still such a level of intensity and uncertainty that
it holds you on the edge of your seat right up until the end.
Zero Dark Thirty is a great
movie that fortunately remains objective and focuses on the behind-the-scenes
events that lead up to defeating the notorious terrorist leader. There are some
scenes, such as the torture scenes mentioned above, that are uncomfortable to
watch and there is plenty of profanity. If you’re offended by such material, I
don’t recommend watching this movie. However, I do encourage you to see it if
you can tolerate several F-bombs and a few torture scenes. It’s a great movie
with an excellent storyline and deep, meaningful characters. It’s suspenseful
at times, and stressful in “paperwork” scenes. It’s just a great film. No
wonder it’s been nominated for Oscar Awards.
Is there a major world event that has been shown on the news that you think would make a good movie? What is it and what would make it a good movie? Comment below and tell me why!
Is there a major world event that has been shown on the news that you think would make a good movie? What is it and what would make it a good movie? Comment below and tell me why!
No comments:
Post a Comment