It’s not often that a truly
ambitious movie hits theaters. It’s also pretty rare when a movie that focuses
on theme more than story or narrative remains very interesting. Lana and Tom
Wachowski (who directed The Matrix)
wrote and directed this innovative piece of cinema with the help of Tom Tykwer
and brought us an enigmatic movie called Cloud
Atlas (2012).
Cloud Atlas
is an exploration of how the actions of individual lives impact one another in
the past, present, and future, as one soul is shaped from a killer into a hero,
and an act of kindness ripples across the centuries to inspire a revolution.
Everything is connected: an 1849 diary of an ocean voyage across the Pacific;
letters from a composer to his friend; a thriller about a murder at a nuclear
power plant; a farce about a publisher in a nursing home; a rebellious clone in
futuristic Korea; and the tale of a tribe living in post-apocalyptic Hawaii,
far in the future. Each member of the cast ensemble appears in multiple roles
as the different stories move through time.
Cloud Atlas
is an impossible movie to summarize; that really was the best way to condense
it. There are a total of six stories being told; they are interrelated and
interwoven stories that span centuries. The stories have a chronology to them
with a unique setting and set of characters. The stories are all told
simultaneously, switching back and forth between each story. Usually the
transition between the stories is logical, such as switching rapidly back and
forth between two stories that both have chase scenes. Other times the
transition is less logical, such as a suspenseful moment being interrupted by a
calmer scene in another story, then returning to the suspenseful scene.
This makes the movie somewhat
disorienting at times, but really makes you think about what the feeling,
theme, and idea the movie is trying to communicate. According to David Mitchell
(the author of the novel Cloud Atlas
was based on), the movie is structured “as a sort of pointillist mosaic: We
stay in each of the six worlds just long enough for the hook to be sunk in, and
from then on the film darts from world to world at the speed of a
plate-spinner, revisiting each narrative for long enough to propel it forward.”
A sizeable cast is used for Cloud Atlas. The cast includes Jim
Sturgess, Tom Hanks, David Gyasi, Bae Doona, Hugo Weaving, Jim Broadbent, Hugh
Grant, Keith David, Susan Sarandon, Halle Berry, and Ben Whishaw. Listing the
characters that these actors play in Cloud
Atlas would take a lot of space. Each actor is in each of the six stories,
but playing different characters in each one. In so doing, the movie explores
the concepts of reincarnation and how our actions have far reaching effects in
a way that I have never seen in a movie before. It was fascinating to see how
different souls kept finding each other in different lives.
The actors, Tom Hanks in particular,
act very differently between stories as they play different characters.
Sometimes they are depicted as different ethnicities and sometimes even
different genders. Seeing Hugo Weaving dressed as a very convincing female
nurse was a bit odd. But so was seeing Jim Sturgess with a makeup job that made
him look Korean. The makeup jobs weren’t always convincing, but it did get the
point across.
The art direction was absolutely
stunning. Camera techniques were captivating, the sets and costumes were
stunning, the special effects were spectacular, and even the color pallet and
designs were different from story to story; it was simply fascinating to watch!
Some of the stories were more action based, while others were more calm and
emotional, but they were presented in such a way that really draws you in. Cloud Atlas hooks you right from the
beginning and doesn’t let go.
Cloud Atlas
is very artistic, somewhat abstract, and a very unconventional means of
structuring a movie. Because it’s so artistically complex and unlike anything
else out there, I could very easily see some viewers not enjoying it. I even saw
some audience members at the theater I attended leave before the movie was
over. Cloud Atlas took a
non-traditional narrative, impressionistic, and even a poetic approach. There
was meaningfully implemented profanity, and sex scenes. That is to say it wasn’t
simply junk thrown in to give it a higher rating. I didn’t find it offensive,
but it’s still not something to show young viewers.
Cloud Atlas
was incredible. It was fascinating to watch, captivating, and really makes you
think. At two hours and forty-five minutes it’s a very long movie, but not once
did I feel bored. I felt like I was viewing some mesmerizing abstract art. And
like any abstract art, Cloud Atlas
will not appeal to everyone. If you see it and really enjoy it, I can
sympathize. If you see it and are completely confused or even hate it, I can
totally understand your reasoning. I don’t expect Cloud Atlas to make much in the box office; I don’t think it will
appeal to most viewers because it’s so unusual. But I enjoyed it, and I want to
see it again to try to understand more of what this film is trying to say. If Cloud Atlas sounds like something you
might enjoy, I recommend seeing it, possibly twice. If it sounds too strange
for you, then it probably is and I’d avoid it. Nevertheless, I think I would
like to own a copy of this on Blu-Ray. It’s such an intriguing work of
cinematic art.
Have you ever seen an experimental film? What did you think about it? Did you like it? Did you hate it? Comment below and let me know!
Have you ever seen an experimental film? What did you think about it? Did you like it? Did you hate it? Comment below and let me know!
Good review Dustin. Not as smart or thought-provoking as it likes to think it is, but it’s still an entertaining and interesting movie to see where it goes with itself and how. It’s probably not going to make any of it’s money back, but hey, at least it’s an effort that I’m glad I saw. For free, mind you.
ReplyDeleteNo, it's not as deep or thought-provoking as it would like us to believe. I still think it's good, but it's certainly not going to appeal to everyone. I liked it, I wouldn't mind seeing it again. I almost want to map out each of the six stories to see if I could find more meaning behind some of them. Like what was the deal with the Star birthmark? It wasn't the same person having the same birthmark in each story. I dunno.
DeleteThanks for your comments!