Foreign
films rarely seem to get a lot of publicity in the US. It’s a shame, really.
The US hardly has a monopoly on movies. True, not all foreign films are all
that great, but then not all American films are good either. I discovered Color Me Kubrick (2006) while rummaging
around in a used DVD bin at my local Blockbuster. What drew me to it was the
fact that John Malkovich looks nothing like Stanley Kubrick. I figured this was
a sure indicator of a lousy film, or at best lousy casting. But I watched it anyway
and I was pleasantly surprised.
Set
in London in 1990’s, a balding alcoholic with an unsteady American accent
introduces himself in pubs and other social setting as Stanley Kubrick. Drinks
and meals are suddenly on the house or paid for by an admiring person who finds
Stanley fascinating. But this man is not Stanley Kubrick. He’s an Englishman by
the name of Alan Conway (John Malkovich). He has conned many people into
believing that he is the reclusive American director, despite the fact that
Conway is openly gay, bares no physical resemblance to Kubrick, and knows
little about the director’s work. The clever conman scrounges drinks, cash, and
sexual favors from an array of unsuspecting victims ranging from heavy metal
bands to wine bar owner (Richard E. Grant) to a British lounge singer (Jim
Davidson). All are awestruck by his alleged fame and fortune, and overlook
Conway’s genuinely bizarre behavior in hopes of impressing the great director.
But when he tries to fool New York Times theater critic Frank Rich (William
Hootkins), Conway’s act begins to unravel.
You
could call Color Me Kubrick a kind of
satire of celebrity worship. The people Conway interacts with are instantly
star struck and are willing to bend over backwards to impress this person who
claims to be a famous movie director. Few people even bother to think that in
no way does Conway resemble Kubrick. Sure, his ruse is caught by a few people,
but most of the characters simply worship Conway for no reason other than he
says he’s famous. We really do often give unmerited glory and honor to people
of a celebrity status simply because they are famous. Color Me Kubrick kind of shows us how we get so caught up in that
fanaticism that we could easily be taken advantage of. What’s scary is this
movie is based on true events.
Conway’s
character was brilliantly acted. Conway doesn’t seem to have any idea who
Stanley Kubrick is and puts on different personas with each con job. Sometimes
acting like an English gentleman, other times acting like a flamboyant Jewish
stereotype. We don’t seem to see enough of Conway’s real self, which makes the
character a bit difficult to relate to, but that fits into the story. No one
seems to know who this man really is, and neither do we. Malkovich did a great
job with all the “Kubrick” masks he wears.
One
of the really neat parts of Color Me
Kubrick was periodic homage to Kubrick’s films. In fact, the opening scene
is a direct homage to A Clockwork Orange,
in which we see the after-effects of Conway’s minor cons. Two thugs are sent to
collect a bar bill that Conway has generated by impersonating Kubrick. Conway
had provided the address of an elderly couple as Kubrick’s home address. Of
course the elderly couple has no idea who Conway is nor do they know Stanley
Kubrick. The two thugs (one wearing a bowler hat) try to force their way into
the couple’s home and get arrested for causing a ruckus. This wasn’t part of
Conway’s design, just a very clever artistic license taken by the director.
The
movie also uses classical music pieces that were famously used in Kubrick
films. Some of the songs include The Blue
Danube Waltz by Johann Strauss, as used in the docking scene in 2001: A Space Odyssey. It also used
Henry Purcell’s Funeral of Queen Mary and
Gioachino Rossini’s William Tell Overture
as they each appear in A Clockwork Orange.
The film isn’t trying to imitate Kubrick’s directing style, and the Kubrick
homage isn’t terribly overt. You probably wouldn’t even recognize them if you
hadn’t seen some of Kubrick’s well known films.
The
movie does become repetitive since it is mostly a series of anecdotes about
Conway swindling people. It still remains amusing to watch nonetheless. The
film is not rated, and even though sexual themes are alluded to, there’s
nothing I could see offending anyone. It does use some language, though;
F-bombs are frequently used by some of the Heavy Metal band characters and a
few others. I thought it was an okay movie. I’m glad I saw it. I recommend
seeing it if you have seen several Kubrick films, otherwise you probably won’t
appreciate it that much.
What
is your favorite Stanly Kubrick film? Comment below and tell me why!
No comments:
Post a Comment